Testimonials
Default Banner Image

Federal Court Blocks Enforcement of the CTA Nationwide

New update

UPDATE on Corporate Transparency Act

Reporting Companies “Need Not Comply” with January 1 Deadline

On December 3, 2024, a federal court based in Texas issued an injunction prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) anywhere in the country. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.). 

The Court held that the CTA, was likely unconstitutional and that its implementation would irreparably harm reporting companies who would be forced to divulge sensitive information about their beneficial owners to the United States Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) by January 1, 2025.  If allowed to go forward, the CTA would have applied to an estimated 32.5 million companies. 

The Court found that Congress exceeded its legislative powers when it enacted the CTA.  The Court stated the CTA was “quasi-Orwellian” and would set a dangerous precendent.  The Court further opined that the application of the CTA “would be to rubber-stamp a new form of federal power” that would “threaten the very fabric of our system of federalism”  and that forcing reporting companies to comply with the CTA substantially threatens their constitutional rights. 

The Court further found that because of the CTA’s constitutional flaws and threatened harm, it should be blocked pending further order of the Court.

What Does All This Mean to Your Company?

The court addressed this issue stating that “[existing] reporting companies need not comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline,” and that FinCEN cannot enforce any of the CTA’s penalties for willful noncompliance against entities or individuals.

We will watch this issue closely because the Court entered only a preliminary injunction, which it could theoretically reconsider at some point in the future. In addition, the Court’s decision may be appealed by the Government to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.   If that court allows the decision to stay then another appeal could be taken to the United States Supreme Court. 

As of this date, however, the decision controls and you will not have to comply with the CTA.

For additional information on the CTA and its application, please see our initial blog at:  https://glgattorneys.com/the-corporate-transparency-act-and-its-impact-on-construction-companies/

--------------------------

This article is informational only and meant to provide guidance. It is not meant to be legal advice and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. For what to do in your specific situation, please consult with a qualified Construction Law attorney.

Testimonials

Ghassemian Law provided thoroughly constructed and effective legal strategies for successful outcomes in the complex world of construction law for our small company. Core competence, due diligence, and a commitment to client needs are strengths that inspire confidence and keep producing results when it counts most.

Peter Greenberger

Pacwest Construction and Development Inc

Mahyar and her team possess a wealth of construction and business law expertise. Expertise to both guide a client away from litigation and, if not possible, to skillfully represent them in court.

Thierry Montoya

AlvaradoSmith APC

Mahyar Ghassemian and her firm are the best construction dispute litigators and negotiators in the industry. Mahyar is an expert in this area. Her firms knows the law and are very tenacious in obtaining the best results for their clients. I have been involved in very lengthy litigation as co-counsel in a very big case and jury trial. Mahyar is one of the hardest working and most effective advocates I have ever had the privilege of working with.

Paul Hoffman

Hoffman Legal Corporation

Small Firm Value – Large Firm Expertise