As a construction law firm with years of experience working representing contractors, we know just how how complicated public works projects can get. Which is why our construction litigation attorneys have created this California Public Works Contract series—to help public contracts workers and contractors, within the state of California, to familiarize themselves with this intricate system.
Last week, in part two of our four-part California Public Works Contract series, we discussed how public contracts are formed and what bonds are needed. Today, we’ll extend this conversation to cover the basics of prevailing wages.
According to the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), in the state of California, the prevailing wage rate is the basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers engaged in a particular craft, classification or type of work within the locality and in the nearest labor market area (if a majority of such workers are paid at a single rate). If there is no single rate paid to a majority, then the single or modal rate being paid to the greater number of workers is prevailing.
Labor Code Section 1773 requires that Contractors employed for public works must pay prevailing wages, even if a contractor has not been advised that the work is a “public work” requiring payment of prevailing wages.
All workers employed on public works must receive payment of at least the prevailing wages and benefits and premium pay, if applicable, for the proper craft and classification of their work. In addition if Prevailing wage fringe benefits are not properly payable to a union or another authorized entity, they must be paid directly to the worker as additional wages. There are damages and penalties for prevailing wage violations.
All contractors and subcontractors must employ apprentices properly enrolled and participating in registered apprenticeship programs. These may be paid at the lower prevailing wage rates established for them, but again extensive reporting and compliance duties exist.
A contractor who employs journeymen, must employ apprentices in the same craft or trade as the journeymen employed.
The Labor Code requires that public agencies have to advise contractors that the work for which they are contracting is a “public work” requiring payment of prevailing wages.
Contractors working on public works also have to keep Certified Payroll Records ( CPRs). A CPR is a payroll record with a required certification under penalty of perjury. CPRs must be on forms provided by the federal or state authority that has jurisdiction over the work or contain the same information as the forms.
Any person or entity can request inspection or copies of CPRs. A contractor or subcontractor has 10 days to respond after receiving the written request for the CPRs and can be potentially debarred if it fails to provide the CPRs.
The preceding is a summary of legal subjects provided for informational purposes only. Most legal issues need complex factual and legal analysis. You are advised not to rely on these blogs and seek legal advice about your specific issues from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Nothing in these writings is intended to create, or creates, an attorney-client relationship. For consultation with a licensed attorney
This article is informational only and meant to provide guidance. It is not meant to be legal advice and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. For what to do in your specific situation, please consult with a qualified Construction Law attorney.
June 07, 2023
May 08, 2023
April 26, 2023
March 31, 2023
February 16, 2023
Mahyar was a big part in helping start our company and setting up our corporation. She also went to battle with a Billion dollar Corporation to keep our doors open when they tried everything to shut us down.
In 2008 -2009, our company was involved in a lawsuit with over 1 million dollars claimed against us. Mahyar Ghassemian handled our case expertly and conscientiously. She explained on a regular basis the progress of our case and how each of the actions of our opponent would ultimately affect our case. At no time did we feel alone or compromised as Mahyar boldly stayed her course which eventually provided us with the satisfactory outcome we had hoped to achieve. She will be our first call should the need arise in the future.
Many years ago an insurance carrier hired Mahyar Ghassemian to defend my construction firm in civil litigation. Not only was Ms. Ghassemian very knowledgeable and competent regarding the legal proceedings, but she was also personally vested in our well-being; she cared what happened. She counseled us regarding the various options, listened to our input and proceeded accordingly. In multiple cases with Ms. Ghassemian, we have never experienced a negative outcome. Today my first call when a potential legal issue is on the horizon is to Ms. Ghassemian. She is both extremely effective and cost conscious.
Small Firm Value – Large Firm Expertise