Default Banner Image


The Previous  Law:

The Lease-Lease Back construction law authorizes a school district to lease a school site to a contractor for a token amount (say for example $1), if the lease contract requires the contractor to construct, or provide for the construction of, a building to be used by the school district, so long as the title to the building would vest in the school district at the end of the lease.  The contractor will then build the school and lease it back to the district for up to 40 years.  After the lease period, the property’s ownership will revert back to the district.

Prior to January 2017, one feature of the law was that a school contractor could be chosen without competitive bidding.  This presented a lot of issues as you can imagine because it was contrary to the notions of fairness that are present in all areas of public contracting.

Its Effects:

A lot of misuse of this law happened.  School boards and administrators were building facilities without going through the difficult process of asking voters to approve bonds and therefore tax themselves.

Of course some school officials also used this to avoid competitive bidding altogether. So the came up with projects, where the “leases” would last only through construction, at the end of which the contractor would be paid off, thus cutting off the other contractors from a chance to participate at all.

New Law:

As of January 2017, the law has been changed.  School districts must now advertise for bids for these projects.  The change allows a larger pool of contractors to participate and present competitive bids.  Such a process is meant to ensure that, like any other public contract job, the lowest responsive bidder will win.

This amendment also provides for payment of costs, but not profit, to contractors who performed work on a project, but a court later finds they were not in compliance with the former law.

This is an important development.  If your company is involved in public contracting, make your bidding and estimating departments aware of this new law.  We at Ghassemian Law Group consistently help contractors involved in public contracting with their contracts as well as bid protests.  Please call if you have any questions.


This article is informational only and meant to provide guidance. It is not meant to be legal advice and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. For what to do in your specific situation, please consult with a qualified Construction Law attorney.


Mahyar was a big part in helping start our company and setting up our corporation. She also went to battle with a Billion dollar Corporation to keep our doors open when they tried everything to shut us down.

Danny Lamping

Classic Refrigeration Company

In 2008 -2009, our company was involved in a lawsuit with over 1 million dollars claimed against us. Mahyar Ghassemian handled our case expertly and conscientiously. She explained on a regular basis the progress of our case and how each of the actions of our opponent would ultimately affect our case. At no time did we feel alone or compromised as Mahyar boldly stayed her course which eventually provided us with the satisfactory outcome we had hoped to achieve. She will be our first call should the need arise in the future.

Kelly Owen

Clarion Construction, Inc.

Many years ago an insurance carrier hired Mahyar Ghassemian to defend my construction firm in civil litigation. Not only was Ms. Ghassemian very knowledgeable and competent regarding the legal proceedings, but she was also personally vested in our well-being; she cared what happened. She counseled us regarding the various options, listened to our input and proceeded accordingly. In multiple cases with Ms. Ghassemian, we have never experienced a negative outcome. Today my first call when a potential legal issue is on the horizon is to Ms. Ghassemian. She is both extremely effective and cost conscious.

Russell Patterson

The Patterson Company

Small Firm Value – Large Firm Expertise